Network Neutrality

Summary of Positions

91��ý

91��ý endorses strong, enforceable net neutrality rules that ban blocking, throttling, or degrading of any lawful internet content.
91��ý opposes “paid prioritization” for internet traffic as an inherently unfair practice.
91��ý supports efforts to protect net neutrality in federal court.
91��ý supports legislation that preserves the competitive online markets for content and services.
91��ý supports state-level efforts to preserve net neutrality protections for consumers and institutions like libraries.

The Issue

91��ý

Network neutrality is the principle that internet service providers should treat all data equally and should not discriminate or provide preference to any data regardless of its source, content, or destination. Net neutrality is essential for libraries to meet our public mission and is an expression of our professional values. America’s libraries collect, create, and disseminate essential information to the public over the internet. The open internet is a vital platform for free speech and intellectual expression. Libraries also ensure users can access the internet and create and distribute their own digital content and applications.

In February 2015, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approved rules that gave internet users the most robust net neutrality protections to date. In June 2016, a federal appeals court affirmed the FCC’s Order. But in December 2017, the FCC voted to jettison the 2015 rules by eliminating the regulatory underpinning of that law. The FCC also dropped the rule that authorized the regulator to oversee ISP behavior. Less than six months after the 2017 FCC vote, 36 states had proposed or passed a resolution, bill, or executive order supporting net neutrality protections.

The 91��ý has been on the front lines of the net neutrality battle with the FCC, Congress, and the federal courts for more than a decade, working in coalition with other library and higher education organizations as well as broader coalitions of net neutrality advocates. Without strong net neutrality protections in place, there is nothing to stop internet service providers from blocking or throttling legal internet traffic or setting up commercial arrangements where certain traffic is prioritized over other traffic. In practice, this will make it harder for people to have equitable access to the internet and for libraries to serve their patrons. A non-neutral net gives entities who can afford to pay more control over what information every American can access, potentially relegating libraries and other non-commercial enterprises to the internet’s “slow lanes.”