Awards Manual

91´«Ã½

FUNCTION STATEMENT

The 91´«Ã½ Awards Committee shall make recommendations to the Executive Board and the 91´«Ã½ Council on all policies relating to 91´«Ã½ distinguished service, exemplary accomplishment, and/or achievement awards, and 91´«Ã½ book/media awards to be made or sponsored by 91´«Ã½ and its units. It shall administer all such awards presented in the name of the 91´«Ã½, known as “91´«Ã½ General Awards.” All 91´«Ã½ General Awards shall recognize achievements within the profession. The Committee shall:

  • review periodically, or on request, the appropriateness of existing 91´«Ã½ General Awards;
  • shall recommend modification, elimination, or suspension of existing 91´«Ã½ General Awards as needed;
  • Shall make recommendations with respect to proposed new 91´«Ã½ General Awards.
  • appoint juries to select recipients of 91´«Ã½ General Awards (i.e., awards not administered by a unit of the Association),
  • Coordinate the work of these juries and committees.
  • Work with other units of the Association to coordinate tracking, statistics, and other information about all awards sponsored by 91´«Ã½ and its units.
  • Takes responsible for maintaining and revising the 91´«Ã½ Awards Manual, which includes information for all awards presented by 91´«Ã½ or any of its units;
  • Provide general guidance regarding the procedural aspects of the Awards Program (such as information concerning deadline dates and publicity releases).

Each unit of 91´«Ã½ shall determine new awards relating to its specific area of responsibility. These new “91´«Ã½ Unit Awards" must adhere to the general 91´«Ã½ Awards policies outlined.

Each unit shall review the appropriateness of its existing awards periodically; and shall modify, eliminate, or suspend its existing award(s) and shall handle all details and expenses with respect to its award(s). All details and expenses regarding awards will be handled by the unit.

Each unit will submit its proposals for new awards or changes to existing unit awards as prescribed in the 91´«Ã½ Awards Manual to the 91´«Ã½ Awards Committee at a regular meeting of the committee at least six months prior to the anticipated date of advertisement. The Awards Committee will review and provide assistance to the unit on questions of procedure and coordination with other 91´«Ã½ units. All new awards must be reported prior to the implementation date to the Awards Committee, Executive Board, and Council.

Return to Top of Page

POLICY

Each year, the 91´«Ã½ seeks to honor, through its awards program, those who have rendered distinguished Service to libraries and librarianship. Such recognition is made for individual achievement of a high order in some area of librarianship. The winners of 91´«Ã½ awards for individual achievement constitute a "hall of fame" for librarianship. The juries making the selections are responsible for maintaining the high standards established by their predecessors in selecting individuals who have furthered to a notable degree the purposes of the profession.

Administration of the 91´«Ã½ general awards and grants is under the jurisdiction of the Awards Committee, appointed by the President-elect and approved by the Executive Board. The Chair of the 91´«Ã½ Awards Committee appoints juries to select recipients of 91´«Ã½ general awards and, along with the staff liaison, coordinates the work of these juries.

No limit is imposed on the number of 91´«Ã½ general awards and grants established, but it is expected that the number will remain small since the prestige of existing awards may be lessened with each new award that is established. The minimum amount for 91´«Ã½ Recognition Awards is $5,000, and for Grants, $10,000. Offices, Divisions, and Roundtables are not 91´«Ã½ association-wide awards and do not have to adhere to the minimum monetary amounts.

All awards should recognize achievement within the profession. All aspects of the profession should be represented in the 91´«Ã½ Awards Program. Overlapping in closely related areas should be avoided.

The winner of each award is selected according to the stated terms of the particular award. Neither jury members nor their library can be considered for the award if they are serving on the jury making that award. Apart from these limitations, all members of the profession are eligible for award consideration. 91´«Ã½ awards are intended to recognize living persons rather than to honor the deceased; therefore, awards are not made posthumously except in situation where death occurs between the time nominations are closed and the winners announced. 91´«Ã½ awards may honor retired librarians unless otherwise excluded under the terms of an award for which they have been nominated. For purposes of awards, the term “librarian" is not limited to those with formal library degrees, but includes anyone with a recognized library affiliation, unless otherwise defined by the award.

No individual may be selected for the same award more than once, except in such cases where the award is made for an accomplishment or project, such as a publication, not previously honored; further, no individual shall be selected for more than one award administered by the 91´«Ã½ Awards Committee in any one year. A single individual; however, may be selected for more than one award over a period of years.

Return to Top of Page

AWARDS COMMITTEE

The Awards Committee is responsible for the coordination and administration of the general 91´«Ã½ Awards Program. The Staff Liaison works directly with the Awards Committee chair for overall administration and policy oversight. Award juries and committees of any unit or division function independently and not as a subcommittee of the Awards Committee.

In accordance with Article VIII. Committees. Sections 1 & 2 of the 91´«Ã½ Bylaws the Committee consists of nine members appointed by the Executive Board upon the advice of the Committee on Appointments, with consideration being given to recommendations made by division presidents, members of the current Awards Committee, and the membership at large of the Association. The interests of various types of libraries and library activities should be represented on the Committee at all times, with priority to have wide geographical distribution among the members.

Members are appointed for two-year terms, and reappointment may be made for a second, but not a third, consecutive term. The Executive Board designates the chair annually. Any vacancy occurring on the Committee is filled by appointment by the Executive Board. Such member is expected to serve until the expiration of the conference year in which the vacancy occurs, at which time an appointment shall be made to complete the unexpired term.

Expectations of the committee members include:

  • Attending meetings of the committee at Annual and Midwinter Conferences, with the first meeting after coming on the committee (Midwinter Conference) being considered mandatory.
  • Taking part in committee discussions held during the year via Connect, email, and other formats as the chair determines.
  • Contacting the Chair in a timely fashion if unable to attend any scheduled meeting, either online or face to face. Note that missing three consecutive meetings without notifying the Chair will result in your being deemed inactive and a replacement requested.

Donors and/ or sponsors of 91´«Ã½ Awards are not eligible for appointment to the 91´«Ã½ Awards Committee unless stated and approved in Award Proposal.

Meetings

The Committee meets during the Midwinter Meeting and the Annual Conference of the Association. Additional meetings may be called by the chairperson if appropriate.

Minutes of all meetings of the Committee are prepared by the Staff Liaison and filed at Headquarters in the Governance office.

Closed meetings may be held only for the discussion of matters affecting the privacy of individuals or institutions.

Members of the Awards Committee are responsible for:

  1. Administering the general awards and grants presented in the name of the 91´«Ã½, known as "91´«Ã½ Awards." The exception is for Honorary Members who are nominated by the Executive Board and elected by 91´«Ã½ Council.
  2. Presenting recommendations to Council on all policies relating to awards to be made or sponsored by 91´«Ã½ and its units.
  3. Reviewing the appropriateness of existing 91´«Ã½ Awards at least every three years to insure conformance with 91´«Ã½ goals and objectives and consistency of application. Reports of jury chairs provide basic information for this review.
  4. Recommending modifications, elimination, or suspension of existing 91´«Ã½ Awards.
  5. Making recommendations with respect to proposed new awards.
  6. Encouraging the establishment and funding of new awards as appropriate.
  7. Publicizing the awards program by announcing in advance each year the awards that are to be made and for reporting the names of all winners after selections have been made.
  8. Serving on one 91´«Ã½ Awards jury, when appropriate. Where juries require members from the Awards Committee beyond the number available, a former member of the Awards Committee may be appointed.
  9. Encouraging and submitting nominations.

Duties of the Award Committee Chair:

It is the duty of the Chair to:

  1. Call meetings of the Committee during the Midwinter Meeting and the Annual Conference, and to call any other meetings that may be needed throughout the year. The Staff Liaison is responsible for completing Meeting Request Forms and submitting all requests to Conference Services.
  1. Meetings during Midwinter Meeting are the principal business meetings of the year when, for example, proposals for new awards are considered, reviews of existing awards are presented, and the discontinuance of current awards are recommended. Plans for the presentation of awards during the Annual Conference are discussed at these meetings.
  2. Meetings during the Annual Conference should also be for the purpose of outlining the year's work with both incoming and outgoing members of the Committee and jury chairs, and for transacting other business as necessary.
  3. A meeting should be scheduled in advance of at least one Council meeting, in order that appropriate recommendations might be made to Council during Midwinter. (91´«Ã½ Recognition Awards only).

  1. Appoint juries for all awards administered by the Committee as soon as possible. Suggestions should be requested from the current jury chairs regarding potential members to serve as chairs and members of the next year's jury. Suggestions for jury appointments may be requested from division presidents and units within 91´«Ã½, state agencies and associations, Awards committee members, headquarters staff, and the association membership, at large. In most cases, it is appropriate to seek a representation of people from different types of libraries; in some cases, the specifics of the award require designated representation.

  1. Present matters concerning awards to Council, as necessary, for action or information.

Juries

Juries are appointed annually by the Awards Committee Chair for the purpose of selecting recipients of the 91´«Ã½ Awards. Donors are not eligible to serve on the jury for their award unless stated and approved in their award proposal. There are five members per jury exceptions are allowed. Award winners will be selected by March 15th.

Neither jury members nor their institutions are eligible for nominations for the award jury on which they are currently serving. If this occurs, jury members should recuse themselves from discussion or voting or decline the nomination if they have a conflict of interest. If a further conflict of interest exists, the jury members should recuse themselves from voting. If necessary, final determination shall be made by the 91´«Ã½ Award Committee Chair. If there is any other conflict of interest, it should be discussed with the 91´«Ã½ Awards Committee Chair who will make the final determination.

Duties of the Jury Chair

As the person responsible for overseeing the selection process for a specific award, the Jury Chair should become familiar with the general description, selection criteria, and previous

recipients of the award.

It is the duty of the Jury Chair to:

  1. Schedule meetings as needed for the selection of an award recipient. 91´«Ã½ policy 7.4.4. Jury deliberations are "closed sessions."
  2. Insure that the jury understands the criteria and selection process for that particular award.
  3. Publicize their particular award to colleagues and notable candidates using as wide a variety of communication mechanism as useful.
  4. Encourage and submit nominations considered worthy of an award.
  5. Manage the awards distribution and deliberation process as needed, managing timelines and ensuring deadlines are met.
  6. If applicant pool is inadequate, review the jury's file for the previous two years.
  7. Make the award selection;
  8. Forward appropriate documentation to the 91´«Ã½ Awards Program Office in a timely fashion;
  9. Notify winners and the nominators of those not selected

Duties of the Jury Members

  1. Jury members are responsible for understanding the criteria upon which the award is given
  2. Publicize their particular award to colleagues and notable candidates using as wide a variety of communication mechanism as useful.
  3. Encourage and submit nominations considered worthy of an award.
  4. If applicant pool is inadequate, review the jury's file for the previous year.
  5. Manage the awards distribution and deliberation process as needed.

Return to Top of Page

PROCEDURES

Publicity

The Staff Liaison prepares a press release with a brief description oa all 91´«Ã½ Awards to encourage nominations. The announcements of awards will be published in the September issue of American Libraries and through other 91´«Ã½ venues.

Nominations

Nominations and letters of recommendations may be received from individual 91´«Ã½ members and should reach the 91´«Ã½ Awards Program Office by the date noted on the application. Each nomination should be submitted online and accompanied by a statement of qualifications as well as reasons for the choice. Receipt of each nomination will be promptly acknowledged to the person who made the nomination.

Deadline for submissions may be extended as needed.

Nominations which were considered worthy by a jury may be forwarded to the incoming chair of the jury for consideration in the next year. The Chair should contact the nominator for any updates to the nomination. Nominations which have been pending for more than two years are to be destroyed.

Each annual jury must rule on the eligibility of nominations according to the overall policy outlined in the Awards Manual and in the stated terms of the particular award. Jury chairs may seek the advice of the Awards Committee in interpreting policy and terms.

Jury Meetings

In concurrence with 91´«Ã½ open/closed meeting policy, all jury meetings will be closed when considering merits of individuals or projects for awards and grants unless otherwise specified by the donor and agreed to by the Awards Committee. Juries can meet at the Midwinter Meeting if necessary but may utilize other means of meeting as appropriate (i.e. web conferencing, email, phone, etc.).

Bylaws VIII Section 8. Votes in the Executive Board, as well as in committees, may be taken by mail, electronic system, or conference call, provided that all members are canvassed simultaneously. An affirmative vote from two-thirds of a quorum of the body shall be required.

Jury chairs should inform the 91´«Ã½ Awards Committee Chair of any problems that arise in the handling of their duties and make any recommendations concerning the award which they deem necessary.

Lack of Suitable Applicants

Juries are not obligated to make a selection of a winner in any year when appropriate candidates for an award are not available.

Selection

Each jury member will be provided with the names of all eligible candidates/projects, the nominating statements, and other supporting documentation prior to the Midwinter Meeting. A systematic procedure for evaluating nominations should be agreed upon prior to selection. If a vote is taken, all jury members, including the chair, are entitled to vote.

The jury chair will notify the Staff Liaison, and jury members of the jury's selection, as soon as it is made. The Staff Liaison will instruct the jury chair when to notify the winner.

In the event that the same person is selected for two or more awards in the same year, the Staff Liaison shall contact the winner, and ask the winner which award he/she would prefer to receive, and the appropriate jury will be asked to make another selection.

When notifying the winner, the jury chair should request one color head photo (as a jpg or tif, 300 dpi, and at least 3 to 5 inches) and their vita to use in publicity releases. If the winner is a library, request one color photograph of the library (as a jpg or tif, 300 dpi, and at least 3 to 5 inches). This information should be sent to the Awards Committee Staff Liaison by March 30th. Copies of the letter to the winner should be sent to the chair of the Award Committee and to the Staff Liaison.

The winner of the award should be reminded that while the news of his/her selection may be shared with friends and colleagues, no formal announcement is to be made until the press releases are prepared by the Staff Liaison and publicized through the Public Information Office.

Preparation of Press Releases

Jury chairs should write the draft press release and send to the Staff Liaison as soon as possible after the selection is made.

Preparation of Award Citations

The Jury Chair is responsible for writing the citation for presentation at the Awards Ceremony. Citations are to be sent to the Staff Liaison as soon as possible after the selection is made. The citation will be edited, if necessary, and prepared for printing.

The citation should be suitable for reading at the presentation ceremony and should:

  1. Include pertinent information, succinctly stated, as to why the winner was selected.
  2. Not exceed 200 words in length.
  3. Exclude biographical information except as it may be significant in the winner’s having been selected for the particular award.

Maintaining Files

Non-applicant files are held for three years by the Staff Liaison and then purged. Applications/nominations must be resubmitted each year for consideration. Communications pertinent to policy and procedure will be distributed to the new jury chairs by the Staff Liaison if necessary.

Duties of the Staff Liaison

The Staff Liaison:

  1. Functions as the staff liaison to the Awards Committee and as the juries' contact at 91´«Ã½ Headquarters.
  2. Attends all Midwinter and Annual Conference meetings of the Awards Committee.
  3. Prepares timetables, jury orientation packets, rosters, and general information for the Committee and juries.
  4. Create tip sheet to hand out at the award ceremony.
  5. Prepares nomination letters and appointment acceptance forms for 91´«Ã½ award jury members from names provided by the Chair.
  6. Monitors the progress of the nominating process and checks to make sure all juries are making timely progress in the selection process. Forwards award proposals where appropriate.
  7. If available, submits information to American Libraries for September announcement of award winners. Compiles and prepares the online award information.
  8. Updates and maintains the awards web page
  9. Prepares and orders the citations, requests award monies, and arranges for checks to be processed prior to Annual Conference. They will also provide necessary information helping winners direct their thank you.
  10. Prepares and makes all arrangements for award presentations proceeding the President’s Program, including letters of invitation to the winners and donors, the award script for the Chair, and photographer.

In addition, the staff liaison is also responsible for the following:

  1. Sending copies of the Awards Manual to awards committee members and jury chairs and providing them with a timetable of deadline dates.
  2. Preserving important archival material such as statements affecting policy, proposals for awards whether approved or not, correspondence of lasting value, names of the members of award juries, and relevant financial reports.
  3. Preparing press releases announcing the terms of all 91´«Ã½ awards and inviting nominations from the membership at large. This information is sent to the Public Information Office.
  4. Press releases should be sent to 91´«Ã½ chapter councilors and library associations urging nominations from their members.
  5. Notifying each winner and donor/sponsor when and where to be present for the award ceremony. Notifying award donors of the juries' selection.
  6. Prepare the committee chair's speech for the Awards Ceremony.
  7. Update online list of award winners by September of each year

Return to Top of Page

Establishing a New Award with the 91´«Ã½

A request that a new 91´«Ã½ or unit award be established may come from any member or unit of the Association or from any individual or group outside the Association interested in the recognition and development of libraries and librarianship.

The following points should be carefully considered before a new 91´«Ã½ award is established:

91´«Ã½ awards are of four types. Effective 1995, the minimum amounts are as follows:

  • Grants - $10,000
  • Recognition - $5,000
  • Scholarships - $3,000
  • Conference Sponsorships - $1,000

Administrative Fees

In reviewing a request for a new award, the Awards Committee will consider the cost of administrating an award. The administrative fee for new awards is 20% of the award amount, not to exceed $1,000. This administrative fee does not apply to the Endowment Scholarships. For awards by a unit of 91´«Ã½, administrative costs estimated by the unit shall be included in the proposal and in budget requests as needed.

The purpose of the administrative fee shall be to pay for:

  1. Costs of preparation, printing and distribution of award criteria and nomination forms.
  2. Costs for preparing appropriate citations and/ or plaques.
  3. Publicity and promotion of the award.
  4. Expenses for the award presentation ceremonies.

Administering the proposed award

  1. A workable set of objective standards for selecting a winner is needed.
  2. Awards demanding large or bulky mailings of material among jury members are to be avoided.
  3. The availability of appropriate candidates. (Awards for special projects, study, or writing are generally pursued by the individuals or groups intending to perform the work.)

Life Expectancy of the award

Considerations:

  1. A date for the Awards Committee or unit to review and determine the continuation of an award should be set at the time an award is established. A trial period of three years is usual.
  2. Endowments to insure the continuation of recognized awards of five or more years standing are to be encouraged.

Preparing an Award Proposal

A copy of the award proposal must be submitted electronically to Awards Committee Staff Liaison at least one month prior to the Committee's regular meeting. This frequently is a two stage process. The applicant may be asked to make revisions before approval. This may or may not be accomplished within the space of a Committee. Applicants should allow enough time for this process.

The Awards Committee shall consider each proposal at a regular meeting. It is recommended that a representative of the 91´«Ã½ unit most closely concerned with the proposal to attend this meeting to answer questions and to hear the advice of the committee.

An Award Proposal should include:

  1. Name of Award (Further guidance for the naming of awards is forthcoming.)
  2. Definition, Purpose and Criteria: Specify the person(s) or group(s) eligible to receive the award, the purpose(s) for which the award will be given, and a brief outline of the criteria to be followed in selecting a winner.
  3. Number and Frequency of Award: Designate the number of possible recipients at any one time and the frequency that the award is to be presented. State if a suitable candidate is not found, the award will not be presented that year.
  4. Process by which the jury is formed; what, if any, particular group or groups from which the juries will be chosen; the number of jury members and any special qualifications needed by the jury members.
  5. Deadline for Nomination of Candidates: Specify the date nominations are due and the form that nominations will take, e.g., a statement of outstanding contributions, etc. The dates of the Midwinter Meeting affect the date nominations are due. Unless otherwise specified the deadline for nominations should be February 1.
  6. Screening of Candidates and Recommendations: Indicate the process to be used in determining the award recipient.
  7. Presentation of the Award: Specify dates for the announcement and presentation of the award. 91´«Ã½ awards should be designated for presentation at an appropriate meeting, e.g. Awards Reception, at the Annual Conference.
  8. Form and/or Type of Award: Designate the form and/or type of award to be given. (e.g. cash, citation, medal, etc.)
  9. Donor: Specify the individual, group, institution, etc. who will provide funds for both any cash award to be given and the administrative expenses incurred.
  10. Budget - Develop a 3-5-year budget showing award expenses, administrative fees, promotional costs, certificate costs, and other appropriate expenses.
  11. Contact Person: name, address, and telephone number, fax or email.
  12. Promotional plans: Promotion of the award availability and award recipient publicity plans
  13. Evaluation: Plans for evaluating effectiveness of the award

Note: A copy must be submitted electronically to the Awards Committee staff liaison prior to the Midwinter Meeting or Annual Conference. The staff liaison will notify you when to attend the committee meeting for further discussion.

Those preparing new awards should be present when the committee considers the proposal. In such cases where award money is offered to 91´«Ã½, the Awards Committee, with the approval of the Executive Board with as much guidance as it is possible to get from the potential donor, shall define the intent of the award and set up the criteria for selecting a winner.

Should a proposed 91´«Ã½ award be deemed appropriate by the Awards Committee according to the policy noted above, the chair of the Awards Committee presents the proposal at a regular meeting of the 91´«Ã½ Council for adoption. If approved, the Executive Director will inform the donor of the acceptance of the award. In the case of a proposed unit award, the Awards Committee need only send a statement of the award as an information item to Council.

Should a proposed 91´«Ã½ award be deemed inappropriate by the Awards Committee, a recommendation for its rejection is sent to the Executive Board, but a rejected proposal need not be presented to Council. In the case of a proposed unit award being rejected, the Awards Committee should indicate to the unit representative its reasons for not forwarding its proposal to the Executive Board and Council. A revised proposal can be submitted to the awards committee at the next regular meeting of the committee.

Amending Awards Policy

91´«Ã½ and unit awards may be amended as needed by the 91´«Ã½ Awards Committee or the appropriate unit.

        1. 91´«Ã½ Awards are amended at the requests of 91´«Ã½ Council. Unit Awards are amended by the Unit.
        2. Amending an award follows the same process as proposing a new award.
        3. Award amendments should be clearly indicated

Return to Top of Page

DISCONTINUING OR SUSPENDING AWARDS

Policy

91´«Ã½ awards may be discontinued or suspended for any of the following reasons:

  1. General lack of interest in the award as shown by the failure of a jury to receive any nominations or applications for the award for three consecutive years.
  2. Inability of three consecutive juries to make a selection of a winner because the terms of the award are not relevant, impractical, or outdated.
  3. Continuing pressure on a jury to influence the selection of a winner.
  4. Withdrawal of financial support by the donor.
  5. Any other reasons deemed appropriate by the Awards Committee.

A recommendation to discontinue or suspend an 91´«Ã½ award is presented to Council for action.

Sunsetting Procedures

If an award is discontinued or suspended for any one of the reasons stated above, a statement indicating one of the following reasons should be received by the Staff Liaison or the Chair of the Awards Committee:

  1. A letter from the donor indicating the reason for discontinuation of the award, preferably six months to one year prior to discontinuation.
  2. If applicable, a letter from the estate of a personal donor in the event of death indicating procedures for the continuation or discontinuation of the award.
  3. A letter from the unit indicating the reason for discontinuation and the effective date, preferably six months to one year prior to discontinuation.
  4. A letter from either appropriate staff or the executive director shall be sent to the donor thanking them for their support of the award.

Return to Top of Page

PRESENTATION CEREMONY

The Awards Committee Staff Liaison coordinates and schedules all awards presentations and announcements. 91´«Ã½ Recognition Awards are usually presented at the Awards Ceremony, prior to the President’s Program at the 91´«Ã½ Annual Conference.

Awards are presented in a dignified manner and setting.

Ceremonies may vary from year to year, at the discretion of the incoming 91´«Ã½ President-Elect. It is recommended that:

  1. The recipients are presented to the presiding officer by the chair of the Awards Committee with the 91´«Ã½ Awards chair reading the citation in whole or in part.
  2. The purpose of the award is stated in presenting a winner.
  3. Acceptance speeches by the recipient as well as the donor/sponsor are not allowed. (Exceptions when it is the first time the award is presented the donor may speak for a limited time with approval)
  4. The announcement of unit awards presented at other meetings of 91´«Ã½ not be repeated at the 91´«Ã½ Awards Reception.

Return to Top of Page

OTHER UNIT AWARD RESPONSIBILITIES

Each 91´«Ã½ division or unit is responsible for the administration of those awards it presents within the general 91´«Ã½ policies governing awards.

Unit Responsibility

Each unit will:

  1. Review periodically the relevancy of its existing award(s) and report on this review to the 91´«Ã½ Awards Committee.
  2. Modify, eliminate or suspend its existing award(s) and notify the 91´«Ã½ Awards Committee Chair and the Staff Liaison of any such action.
  3. Handle all details and expenses with respect to its award(s).
  4. Submit an electronic copy of its proposal for new awards or revisions of existing unit awards to the 91´«Ã½ staff liaison one month prior to a regular meeting of the Committee.

91´«Ã½ Awards Committee Responsibility

The 91´«Ã½ Awards Committee will:

  1. Review and provide assistance to the unit on questions of procedure and coordination with other units.
  2. Report all new 91´«Ã½ awards, prior to implementation date to Council.

Return to Top of Page

Older Awards Manuals

Award Manual 2019 (PDF)

Award Manual 2014 (PDF)
Award Manual 2010 (PDF)
Award Manual 2009 (PDF)
Award Manual 2008 (Word)
Award Manual 2007 (Word)
Award Manual 2006 (Word)

Return to Top of Page